Years
of shaping the region.

Together.

25 years of Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme badge

Years
of shaping the region.

Together.

25 years of Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme badge
#MadeWithIBSR experience

25 years of the Programme

Our Programme has been funding transnational cooperation in the Baltic Sea region for 25 years already! It created a favourable framework for organisations from around the Baltic Sea to connect as if there were no borders and to work on joint challenges, together. Our region has developed, the Programme has adjusted its objectives, too. However, one thing has always been solid: it is about cooperation among people who care.  

Thanks to all the fantastic people who has accompanied the Programme since the early beginning or only shared a few parts of the journey, have we achieved so much. We are greater together and thanks to the different cultures, perspectives and expertise that we bring together, have we manage to get that far.

Interreg Baltic Sea Region

Evolution over the years

1997 – 1999

Interreg II C

2000 – 2006

Interreg III A+B+C
Interact point coordination

2007 – 2013

Interreg IV A+B+C

2014 – 2020

Interreg V B

2021 – 2027

Interreg VI B

Discover our achievements
in time capsules

#MadeWithIBSR in 25 years

Agnieszka Ilola

Deputy Head of UBC Sustainable Cities Commission

Thanks to Interreg funding, we were able to provide our member cities with concrete solutions and tools. We created momentum for essential aspects of sustainable water management connected to climate change […] We were able to bring in expertise from other organisations, e.g. universities, service providers, and the private sector. It gave us a bigger scope of actions and a slightly different angle for the UBC strategic agenda. Projects have also been essential for awareness raising, peer learning, and knowledge sharing among our member cities. Last but not least is policy input. […]

Wiktor Szydarowski

Head of the ESPON Programme

It’s about the change of mindsets: it’s opening eyes for policy officers, policy enablers and civil servants. In one of the projects, we had political representatives from several countries involved. Many of them said: we would like to be aware of what is going on outside the administrative borders of our regions to understand the impact of what the others are doing.

It was something fresh and innovative and, I think, it still remains for the organisations that apply for Programme funding for the first time: they enter the new world.

Deimantė Jankūnaitė

Monitoring Committee member, Lithuania

It’s been 19 years since we participated in the Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme. The benefits for our country are significant: 300 Lithuanian partners received more than EUR 20 million over those years.

The Programme offered wide opportunities for partners to find what’s best for Lithuanian regions.

Dmitry Frank-Kamenetsky

Special Advisor to HELCOM

We largely utilised the results under the Interreg umbrella. First of all, all HELCOM policy decisions have always been based on the best available knowledge. And how the Programme selects projects, how these projects are built from expert groups – or project consortiums as Interreg calls them – it all has provided us with perfect, solid scientific background for respective decisions taken by HELCOM.

Blagoveska Riiser

European Commission, Programme’s desk officer

During these 25 years, the Interreg Baltic Sea Region programme has done a great job in demonstrating how so many countries can reach an agreement on common challenges and collaborate to achieve their common goals.

You are a Program that is constantly innovating and not being afraid of learning and trying new things out.

Esa Kokkonen

EUSBSR policy area coordinator Innovation

We believe that the strategic partnership between Interreg Baltic Sea Region and EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region works excellently. And on behalf of the EU Strategy and all its stakeholders, I would like to say that we’ve been very fortunate to have this well-established Programme, with very experienced staff, amazing record of results that we can build on. All this made it possible for us to develop a very ambitious agenda for the macro-region.

Jens Kurnol

Monitoring Committee member, Germany

The most important is Interreg Baltic Sea Region support to the completely new sector: maritime spatial planning. It enabled the Member States to exchange and develop their maritime spatial plans.

Without Interreg, it would probably have taken us ten more years.

Elīna Veidemane

Deputy Head of VASAB Secretariat

The Programme is the first stop when we look for projects. We participate in some of them as partners; we advise others and we follow all of those related to spatial planning. Interreg Baltic Sea Region projects are a source of inspiration and contribution for our work and have great value to us. Relevant knowledge developed by projects is shared within our community. For example, we invite projects for VASAB events to demonstrate their results and use the project findings for our policy building.

Robert Berggren

Monitoring Committee member, Sweden

Sweden has benefitted a lot when we think of the Programme 2014-2020. Around 160 unique Swedish organisations participated in 83 projects. They have widened their contacts in the Baltic Sea region and Europe and gained a lot of new knowledge. All of Sweden participates even if we are a very long and not so populated country.

Michael Koch-Larsen

Monitoring Committee member, Denmark

The Programme has contributed to East-West integration of the region and come to a common understanding of challenges and opportunities in the Baltic Sea. E.g. The acknowledgement of cleaning and keeping clean the sea and seeing it as a common resource.

Anna Hagström

EUSBSR National Coordinator, Sweden

Interreg has helped us strengthen the coordination of our work at all levels, uniting the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region as a whole. It also provided steady support for the effective implementation of the Strategy, allowing for synergies and cross-sectoral solutions to shared challenges in the Baltic Sea region

Max Hogeforster

Hanse Parliament

Thanks to the Interreg projects, we brought tangible results for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the Baltic Sea region for the past 20 years. This would not have been possible without the Interreg support, as many chambers in the region are not that strong financially.

We created many solutions for SMEs to help them run their businesses better. We also created very strong structures that are still intact.

Teresa Marcinów

Monitoring Committee member, Poland

It is worth investing time, effort and money in cooperation in the Baltic Sea area to bring people and institutions together.

We’ve managed to encourage people to cooperate and open their minds.

Torfi Jóhannesson

Nordic Council of Ministers

Interreg also speeded up and harmonised the processes of working with bioeconomy as a concept instead of working with agriculture, forestry, and fisheries separately.

This helped regions and countries develop their own bioeconomy strategies.

Margarita Golovko

Monitoring Committee member, Estonia

When I looked at projects that have been supported since 2004, I can see that challenges and objectives formulated for the current Programme are logically stemming from the ones 20 years ago. 

Carl-Johan Klint

Monitoring Committee member, Sweden

All 83 projects that Sweden have participated in have contributed to developing Sweden in their own different ways.

Tiina Tihlman

Monitoring Committee member, Finland

We wouldn’t know so many people in other countries who are working in maritime spatial planning or we would only meet our colleagues in meetings. This is even impossible to imagine. (…)

This is because we have our common Baltic Sea and we have the Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme which can finance our projects.

Staffan Lund

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

A very good example comes from Kutno County in Poland. They managed to implement local water partnerships driven by several objectives: water quality, biodiversity, access to water in the landscape and sustainable agricultural production. The same goes for Denmark where they have a specific scheme to support local partnerships now.

Monika Cholewczyńska-Dmitruk

Monitoring Committee member, Poland

There are many benefits for Poland (…). First of all, we can solve problems which could not be solved using partnerships on a local, regional or national level.

Partners cooperate with people from different countries to build a more innovative, better accessible and sustainable region.

#IBSRmemories

Ilga Gruševa

Monitoring Committee member, Latvia

My best memories are related to the programming process when the Programme is being developed. It is when the Member States, in cooperation with the Programme stakeholders and the society, identify common challenges and opportunities in the region. This process is always very exciting and intensive. And after developing the Programme, it is also very interesting to look back and evaluate the achieved results. And I can say – with great satisfaction – that these results are remarkable!

Esa Kokkonen

EUSBSR policy area coordinator Innovation

My oldest memories go back to one of the Programme conferences at the beginning of this millennium. It was still early in my career as a Baltic Sea region cooperation professional. We hadn’t been involved in the Programme yet: everything sounded difficult and the competition seemed hard. But with experience gained in projects, taking next steps was always easier. In 2005, we started our first project as lead partner and, since then, we’ve been deeply involved in all programming periods.

We’ve advanced year after year and the Programme keeps raising the bar. I feel that the best memories are the latest ones related to the current Programme. Our collaboration as policy area coordinator Innovation with project developers has been very inspiring. It is so exciting to see what can be done with the Programme today and how much experience and knowledge is there among the stakeholders.

Elīna Veidemane

Deputy Head of VASAB Secretariat

It goes back to the year 2009 and the project BaltSeaPlan. At that time, I worked at the Latvian Ministry responsible for environment protection and regional development, and one of my tasks was to prepare national concept for introducing maritime spatial planning into national spatial planning system. For that time maritime spatial planning was completely new discipline, there was very little experience even in whole Baltic Sea Region. So we joined an Interreg Baltic Sea Region project BaltSeaPlan as an associated partner.

Wiktor Szydarowski

Director of the ESPON Programme

All members of the Monitoring Committee were new at that time. In early September 1999, we met in the Swedish region of Västerbotten. Back then we used to travel with economy tickets so we had to stay over the weekend to go back home. The host organised wild water rafting in our free time. I remember the rubber boats and suits we had to wear. When we went down the river, we had to learn how to row at the same pace and the same rhythm: all the people of different ages and postures. It was a very interesting experience how we managed to become one team in the boat and then, naturally, in the Programme implementation. This trip created a lot of positive feelings and glued the team together. At many Monitoring Committee meetings that followed we worked very well together.

Ann Irene Saeternes

Monitoring Committee member, Norway

The best memory has been the opportunity to learn about the other countries in the region.  As part of the Programme, we have been able to travel around the region and observed the different countries and people – their cultures, traditions and politics. This is the added value of being part of the Interreg family: this atmosphere, open structures and sincere cooperation interest.

I have especially good memories from the time when I started working with the Programme. I was taken under the wings of Harry Ekestam (Finland) and Wilfried Görmer (Germany), and learned from them a lot.

Robert Berggren

Monitoring Committee member, Sweden

I started working for the Programme in 2008 as a first-level controller. I still remember when I read the Programme Manual for the first time, trying to understand the eligibility rules and reporting. It was challenging in the beginning to get to know the language and the terminology

Deimantė Jankūnaitė

Monitoring Committee member, Lithuania

My best memories and oldest memories are about our Lithuanian start in the Programme. I joined the Programme 18 years ago. Interreg Baltic Sea Region was like our Mother Programme. We only started our cross-border cooperation programmes with Latvia, with Estonia. We took everything that was best: the best practices and all the lessons from Interreg Baltic Sea Region. I remember our first visits to Rostock: back then we visited the Joint Secretariat once or twice per year. We participated in discussions and seminars together and this is how our experience with Interreg was born. […]

Jens Kurnol

Monitoring Committee member, Germany

My oldest memories related to Interreg Baltic Sea Region are also my best ones. They are related to Wilfried Görmar (note: former Monitoring Committee member), who had always been so engaged, so happy, so excited about the Baltic Sea region cooperation. He was spreading this spirit every time he came back from the Programme or project meetings.

For some reason, these Northern transnational cooperation programmes have a really strong cooperation spirit. It might have something to do with the Baltic Sea and the shared history.

Max Hogeforster

Hanse Parliament

My best memory goes back to 2007 when we had our final conference of the B-SME project in the Parliament Building in Copenhagen.

Looking at all our 89 participants from the project, I really felt that everyone was so committed to doing more for SMEs in the region. I felt that this final meeting of the project was only the start of a newly budding cooperation. And it was.

Teresa Marcinów

Monitoring Committee member, Poland

I like listening to the stories of beneficiaries to see how the theory included in the Programme document is translated into their ideas and concrete actions.

Margarita Golovko

Monitoring Committee member, Estonia

I remember when I joined the Monitoring Committee of the Programme as the leader of the national delegation. (…)

I was amazed by the scale of the topics that were taken up by the Programme and the number of already functioning pan-Baltic networks as well as by the professionalism of the MA/JS staff.

Erk Westermann-Lammers

Chairman of the Management Board of the Investitionsbank Schleswig-Holstein

The best memory is the continuous value Interreg Baltic Sea Region added for the region and the people, its constant contribution to the economic development and the intercultural exchange. Interreg Baltic Sea Region has led to a cross-border understanding of the challenges and needs of the regions and delivers answers and solutions. It catalyses an invaluable integration process – 25 year ago, now and in the future.

Tiina Tihlman

Monitoring Committee member, Finland

The best memories are about the people.

For us, civil servants and members of the Monitoring Committee, it is really nice to get to know colleagues from other countries and to hear not only about Interreg matters but also about their work and points of view.

Monika Cholewczyńska-Dmitruk

Monitoring Committee member, Poland

If I think of the oldest memory, it would be my training at the Joint Secretariat in Rostock some 20 years ago.

I remember that I spent the whole week in Rostock getting to know the MA/JS team and what their tasks were, I learned how the Programme and project implementation worked.

#HappyBirthdayIBSR

Deimantė Jankūnaitė

Monitoring Committee, Lithuania

A big bunch of wishes: to be visible in the region, to have good projects and to bring prosperous results. The most important would be to still have institutions interested in participating in the Programme. I  am not worried about this, though:

I think Interreg Baltic Sea Region is a flagship programme in the region.

Dmitry Frank-Kamenetsky

Special Advisor to HELCOM

I would like to wish long life to the Programme, and more successful projects as the coordinator of EUSBSR policy area Spatial Planning. We have already a handful of projects in the region for instance in maritime spatial planning but we would like to further cooperate with the Interreg Programme on new project ideas. The Programme really brings a lot to the expert community and the policy-making of the region.

Ilga Gruševa

Monitoring Committee member, Latvia

Make even more effective use of Interreg Baltic Sea Region’s knowledge environment and cross-sectoral cooperation across borders to improve the quality of life for its inhabitants. There is no time to postpone the action. We, in Latvia, as members of the Monitoring Committee, encourage potential applicants to use the opportunities provided by the Programme and apply for funding. You can build on the achieved results, capitalise on the knowledge and identify the gaps where improvements are needed. You can take an active role in bringing tangible benefits of the region!

Esa Kokkonen

EUSBSR policy area coordinator Innovation

We’ve been harshly reminded that big changes or crises can happen. So, my main message for the Programme is: facilitate the change and help the region be stronger together.

And I am so happy about the current Programme agenda. Although it was it was prepared before the COVID crisis, it does enable us to tackle current challenges and build resilience for the future.

Ann Irene Saeternes

Monitoring Committee member, Norway

But we are in a special situation now. We have momentum for the Programme to play a central role in fuelling this new strength: we need to stick together. And I think that working together brings us forward and makes us stronger.

In this Programme, we have applied a user perspective and testing solutions to bring the green transition to life. No region or country can do this on their own. We have a lot of good examples and projects so I hope that the Baltic Sea region could be a pilot case in the context of the European Green Deal. I hope the Programme will be the catalyst of knowledge and innovative ideas – that the Programme can really make a difference.

Robert Berggren

Monitoring Committee member, Sweden

Keep the strong networks, strong cooperation and the good spirit that is around the Programme and between the countries that is more important than ever. Stand united. Keep helping each other.

Blagoveska Riiser

European Commission, Programme’s desk officer

Do not lose your ability to innovate and learn from evaluations and experiences. Keep surprising me as you have done so far. Continue your work to get authorities and people from all across the Baltic Sea to collaborate and work together to share best practices and knowledge, and make an impact on the green transition, economic growth, and advances in the social well-being of all people in the region.

Jens Kurnol

Monitoring Committee, Germany

Make sure that we stay in the roots: it’s about cooperation, not competition. It is about our project people and how we bring them together across national and linguistic borders, not about being the most modern or innovative programme. And let’s not copy other programmes either: we should stick to our bottom up principle, joint decision making and a clear territorial approach. And let’s be more inclusive. […]

Anna Hagström

EUSBSR National Coordinator, Sweden

The macro-regional strategy is a platform for a dialogue and joint decision of all our eight member states on many levels of governance and across different policy areas. Interreg has been empowering this cooperation overall.

We hope that this is something that you will continue many, many years. It is valuable for the Baltic Sea region. 

Wiktor Szydarowski

Director of ESPON Programme

Being a geographer, I wish that a strong territorial dimension persists in the Programme so that there is always this territorial glue that connects the projects. I wish that based on the understanding of our territory and its changes, the Programme would address relevant priorities and specific actions by projects so that the existing divides, disparities or disruptions could become smaller and less distinct.

Elīna Veidemane

Deputy Head of VASAB Secretariat

Happy birthday, Interreg Baltic Sea Region! Let everything that you do help create a striving Baltic Sea region! Both VASAB and the Programme, we work for the benefit of the region and better future for our people!

Max Hogeforster

Hanse Parliament

I look forward to the next 25 years and beyond, filled with ground-breaking achievements, strengthened partnerships, and enduring legacies.

I am sure the guest list will be long, so I truly wish to be invited to the 50 anniversary.

Teresa Marcinów

Member of the Monitoring Committee, Poland

I wish the Programme to continue contributing to the development of regions around the Baltic Sea, combining knowledge and good practices from projects with policy instruments.

I wish that our regions together will be able to recover from challenging situations now and in the future.

Margarita Golovko

Member of the Monitoring Committee, Estonia

I wish to the Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme and its beneficiaries that they dig even deeper, address more specific common regional and national challenges.

More focus is what I would like to see in the future.

Carl-Johan Klint

Member of the Monitoring Committee, Sweden

Now, in the wake of the pandemic and other transformative events, transnational cooperation and joint projects across land borders are needed more than ever, and I have a firm belief that our Programme is well positioned to solve future challenges facing the Baltic Sea region.

Erk Westermann-Lammers

Chairman of the Management Board of the Investitionsbank Schleswig-Holstein

Stable democratic institutions and an open dialogue are essential for our transnational cooperation, economic growth and overall prosperity.

The continuous dedication to enhancing international understanding forms the value-based bedrock that enables organizations and individuals to get in contact with one another, connect, and build up transnational projects together, as if there were no borders. 

Kaarina Williams

EUSBSR policy area coordinator Culture

Interreg brings a stable framework that works and I hope it will continue like that. I also hope that the Programme will stay so open and flexible to attract more institutions, like municipalities, who have not been so prone to be part of a transnational project. And I hope for a bigger reach out and strong connections to the next generations: let’s take the youth on the Interreg journey with us!

Staffan Lund

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

I think it’s important that the Programme sticks to its transnational and cross-sectoral approach because it’s the key.

#GetToKnowInterreg

Blagoveska Riiser

European Commission, Programme’s desk officer

It is an honor to join you in celebrating the 25th anniversary of the Programme.

For me, Interreg is all about cooperation across countries, borders, regions and people, about sharing understanding, values and building knowledge, trust and capacity to address common challenges for the prosperity and the resilience of the region. It is about sharing cultures and experiences, as well as a mutual investment in the future growth of the region.

Jens Kurnol

Monitoring Committee member, Germany

My first association is cooperation spirit; this is something that has always fascinated me, especially when I meet with project partners. The same goes to the Member States: it’s incredible to see what’s possible when people agree on joint actions.

Another association that I have is joint management of funds. It is one of the ideas behind setting up transnational programmes in the old days. Several Member States agree on joint perspectives and allocate EU funds together: it is done nowhere else like this. 

Agnieszka Ilola

Union of the Baltic Cities, Sustainable Cities Commission

The first thing is cooperation; this is the essence. Then the people because we are like a family now. It’s amazing to work with all the people with the same vision who are inspired to change the region.

[…] It’s also about trust: trust for my partners, trust in what we do and how we do things together.

Robert Berggren

Monitoring Committee member, Sweden

It is different to work with people from other nations. So, it can be difficult if you are not prepared to it and you do not really try. The end result is worth it. I think it is important to keep up the networks and to maintain the contacts between organisations and regions.

Deimantė Jankūnaitė

Monitoring Committee member, Lithuania

First of all, common work and common challenges, close cooperation to find joint solutions and to solve these challenges. A variety and a big number of institutions. Partnerships that require big mutual trust between all of us. That’s why we are good friends: we learn from each other instead of competing. I think this is very special about Interreg programmes.

Another thing is long discussions which, in this case, is a good thing: this variety of opinions always helps to find good decisions, almost always by consensus.

Esa Kokkonen

EUSBSR policy area coordinator Innovation

To me, Interreg is closely related to the Baltic Sea region even though there are Interreg programmes in other regions, too.

Interreg is also about project work. […] Interreg reminds me that the deadline is coming: either for an application, reporting or some other internal task in the project […] Finally, it is all about people, connections and new networks […]  I got to know amazing people from around the region and learn from them a lot.

Ilga Gruševa

Monitoring Committee member, Latvia

The first one that comes to my mind is the community in which cooperation plays a key role. The next one is cohesion and the opportunity to learn from the best.

Smart solutions are also quite important as they enable to use of the potential of the region as efficiently as possible and to react to unpredictable circumstances in the future.

Wiktor Szydarowski

Director of the ESPON Programme

Let me play with the letter “C” here. We have the connecting aspect: you connect people and ideas that you usually wouldn’t get. The second “C” is of course cooperation, which is in the DNA of Interreg. The third one is co-creation, which has become a fashionable word: you work together with other people who have an interesting perspective that you have never imagined. This collaborative environment enriches your development process and your thinking.

Anna Hagström

EUSBSR National Coordinator, Sweden

Interreg is about joint solutions to common and shared challenges. It is about cooperation across borders and putting local and regional actors at the heart of European action – together.

It is about solidarity and dialogue beyond borders and cultures.

Max Hogeforster

Hanse Parliament

It is really about bringing the people in the Baltic Sea region together and doing something for the area to make it stronger.

It is about creating solutions that work.

Teresa Marcinów

Monitoring Committee member, Poland

When I think of Interreg, I think that cooperation is always better than competition. I think about the idea that not everything is about money but everything is about people.

It is about learning and growing stronger. To me, Interreg means also togetherness. 

Torfi Jóhannesson

Nordic Council of Ministers

Partnerships. I have been involved with Interreg on many levels and it has all been about partnerships.

Bringing people together. Professionalism and this drive to improve things.

Margarita Golovko

Monitoring Committee member, Estonia

Interreg is still the one of few instruments where Member States sit together at one table and discuss what’s important. I can’t see another instrument that would deal with very concrete issues that are jointly agreed on and jointly dealt with.

It is the only regional specific instrument that addresses common regional needs in the most effective and focused way.

Carl-Johan Klint

Monitoring Committee member, Sweden

Interreg has become an institution in Sweden, and a well used tool not only for European cooperation but also for cooperation in the Baltic Sea region.

I think of Interreg as a tool to meet the major societal challenges, not least the green transition, but also to make it easier for citizens and businesses to work, live and operate in a borderless context.

Staffan Lund

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

The great thing about this Programme is its transnational character: cross-sectoral cooperation is at the core of it.

It is the key to developing new ideas, perspectives and attitudes. 

Monika Cholewczyńska-Dmitruk

Monitoring Committee member, Poland

This is how we create change for a better region.

We exchange experiences in our Baltic Sea region family, we share knowledge and show how the results of different projects could be transferred to other regions around the Baltic Sea.

Our projects
Benefits for cities
Our objectives
Our community